I suppose it was inevitable Antoine Fuqua would direct a
boxing picture. The one thing that connects his diverse (and uneven)
filmography – from fine genre fare like Training
Day and King Arthur to lesser
junk like Olympus Has Fallen and The Equalizer – is intense, gory,
bruising violence. So when an early shot in Southpaw
has Jake Gyllenhaal looking straight into the camera, howling in slow motion as
blood and sweat rain off his straining muscles, it’s clear we’re in a place of
macho intensity. Fuqua shoots the boxing matches with reasonable force, and
wisely uses the camera to teach the audience how to read the strategies
involved. But the story between the bouts is merely programmatic, a broad and
bludgeoning collection of tropes. It’s a boxing picture. What do you want, a
roadmap?
It starts with Gyllenhaal’s boxer at the top of his game –
undefeated, even. Soon, he’s fallen on hard times due to a set of tragic
circumstances and his own bad habits – temper, alcohol, and so on. He loses his
wife (Rachel McAdams), is abandoned by his sleazy manager (Curtis “50 Cent”
Jackson), and has his daughter (Oona Laurence) taken away. Now he has to rely
on a tough-but-fair wise old trainer (Forest Whitaker) to help him get back in
fighting shape. If you already think this all ends with a big comeback fight
against a perfectly loathsome rival (Miguel Gomez), you’ve definitively seen a
boxing picture before. Besides, Gyllenhaal’s surname here is Hope. You’ve got
to know where the symbolism is pointing. Sons
of Anarchy showrunner Kurt Sutter’s screenplay plays every note you’d
expect, doing so with a swaggering clobbering melodrama, confident in its
ability to use an audience’s emotions as its speed bag. It thumps away.
Fuqua obliges the formulaic intentions of the material while
keeping the visual interest on the performer’s bodies. He focuses attention on
McAdams’ relaxed sensuality, Jackson’s broad-shouldered business posture, and
Gomez’s slippery fighting stance. But most of all Fuqua takes in Gyllenhaal’s
ripped musculature, a painful display of tense tautness. He clearly worked hard
for this role, and is eager to show off every bit of the gain from the pain.
But it also serves a purpose in telling us everything we need to know about this
boxer. He likes the pain. Thanks to the announcers helpfully shouting out the
subtext during the fights, we learn boxing fans know it’s not a Hope match
until he’s bleeding. His wife tells him he needs to retire before he’s
irreparably punch-drunk. But we soon learn how desperately he needs to keep
going.
We get plenty of Hope’s frustration with his situation,
followed by training montages as he works his way back to some semblance of
normalcy. With a daughter’s happiness imperiled, it’s easy to root for him. But
I appreciated the film’s ability to look somewhat askance at its protagonist,
wondering if his cyclical bad behavior is something that can be fixed. But of
course it can, and he can learn to control his temper in everyday life by
learning to fight better in the ring. Instead of settling into the reality of
its characters’ lives, the movie hops to the next expected beat. It never feels
like a real situation, but an artificial construct built to fit the needs of
its subgenre. It doesn’t breathe like the best of its brethren, where Rocky or Raging Bull or Million Dollar
Baby (or even Real Steel) color in the specifics of their environments.
Southpaw is on a
one-way track to the Big Match. It’s an athletic, well-coordinated display.
Gyllenhaal can land convincing blows, and, because the emotions involved are so
big, heavy, and unsurprising, the stakes are completely clear. The result is a
good replica of a boxing match. It’s exciting and visceral, punches booming so
forcefully in the sound mix I wondered what the Foley artists had to do, every
jab timed to the usual orchestra of crowd reactions. It’s well made without
being completely involving. I sat admiring the technique more than feeling the
tension. Because the way there is so pro-forma, it’s hard to stay invested. The
movie remains a glossy, well intentioned, but over-familiar narrative beginning
to end.
No comments:
Post a Comment