It has been six years since Paul Blart: Mall Cop, a dull and silly Die Hard-in-a-mall comedy starring Kevin James, was a surprise hit.
Never underestimate the box office potential of a January release date and an
ad campaign in which a likable everyman falls down a lot. Was there a vast
amount of untapped story potential in this concept? No. Did Sony think the box
office results of the first would mean there was some small, lingering affection
from audiences to be converted into easy money if a sequel was done on the
cheap? Yes. So. Here we are. Dumb comedies get dumber, repetitive sequels all
the time. Here’s another.
In the first Paul
Blart, the big, pathetic security guard bumbled his way into saving his
mall of employment from robbers. The new Blart
is Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2, instead of
something like 2 Paul 2 Blart or Paul Blart: The Quickening or Paul Blart 2 the Streets. It takes the
man away from his mall to a national convention of security guards in Las
Vegas, where he and his daughter (Raini Rodriguez) eventually stumble upon a
heist in progress and, surprise surprise, must protect the hotel. It’s another indifferently
staged, overlit, lazily photographed underdog story of a guy no one likes somehow saving
the day. The bland heist plot is played totally straight (Neal McDonough is the
baddie) and everything else is theoretically amusing, but I’m not sure where or
why. At one point Blart wrestles a bird. Later, he sees a guy eat a rotten banana. Huh.
Completely predictable and totally devoid of anything
resembling a laugh, the empty, mindless movie left me with just one question.
Is it better to have no jokes than bad jokes? Scene after scene passed by
without any discernable punchlines, sight gags, or stupid asides. I just kept
wondering why no one wrote jokes. Surely someone at some point would’ve seen
dailies or a rough cut and gone back for reshoots or ADR that could punch up
the airless and endless scenes. I mean, you could’ve at least gotten a Foley
artist for some last minute flatulence and slide whistles. It still wouldn’t be
funny, but at least there’d be something. It’s so lazily slapped together by
director Andy Fickman, limply plotted by Nick Bakay and James himself, that
it’s best viewed as a paycheck for all involved. And you don’t have to see it for
the checks to clear.
By the end, pummeled by the total nothingness of the events
on screen, I decided I was thankful no one tried too hard to make this movie
funny, if only for the irritation I felt whenever I faintly detected the presence
of humorous intent. Every beat is geared towards making Blart a pathetic
figure of scorn. I think it’s supposed to make him sympathetic, but most
running jokes are built on the premise that anyone who likes him is stupid or
ridiculous. That’s not funny. It’s sad, like when his mother is killed off in
the opening scene, run over by a speeding truck. Laughing yet? In one scene Blart
gets into a fight with his daughter in a restaurant. She’s angry he’s
overprotective. He’s eating the crunchiest bread ever baked. It goes something
like this. She: “You never listen!” He: Munch. Munch. Munch. Laughing now?
Isn’t it hilarious that he has relationship problems, his
mom was run over, his daughter’s pulling away, and he has problems with food? And no one likes him except other condescendingly
presented oddballs, and even then only sometimes? There’s nothing that deserves
a moment’s thought beyond relief the movie does, indeed, end. But there’s
nagging ugliness – scenes glorifying use of force (Tasers, beanbag
guns, and a vibrating fork) to take down suspects, a man policing his
daughter’s love life above and beyond what’s appropriate, and an implication
that fat people should only interact with other fat people – that’s not just
empty, stupid, and unfunny, but leaves a nasty aftertaste, too. I saw the movie
in a theater with the quietest audience I’ve ever heard. We sat there silently
for 90 minutes, then glumly filed out.
No comments:
Post a Comment