In adapting his Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award-winning play August: Osage County to screenplay form,
Tracy Letts, who has also adapted his Bug
and Killer Joe into movies,
trimmed the runtime by an hour but kept a great deal of its rich selection of
meaty dialogues and monologues. The resulting film gathers a hugely talented
ensemble and sets them before this all-you-can-act buffet and lets them chew.
It’s theatrical, obviously finely written and overacted to the rafters. The
story kicks off with the disappearance of the old patriarch of a large
Oklahoman family. We glimpse him, played by Sam Shephard, in a brief
introductory scene during which he reads us some T.S. Eliot in voice over. But
now he’s gone, and his pill-popping cancer-patient wife (Meryl Streep) calls
her grown daughters (Julia Roberts, Julianne Nicholson, and Juliette Lewis)
home to wait and worry. Showing off its stagebound roots by trapping the
ensemble in a stuffy house – you can almost feel the dusty stillness of the
oppressive late-summer air – the film is eager to show us these great actors
delivering great dialogue.
The screen is crowded with characters and none escape
emotionally unscathed. Streep’s matriarch has cancer of the mouth and early on
shouts that the pain has her feeling like he tongue is on fire. Hoo boy, is it
ever. She spits unfiltered invective at everyone and everything, screwing up
her face as if sucking on a lemon before the acid bubbles out of her, eating
away at her family members. She feels neglected. She feels unappreciated. She
feels abandoned. She’s shockingly mean and caustic under the mistaken belief
that she’s simply telling the truth. You can feel sorry for her while completely
understanding why two of her three daughters would want to move so far away.
Roberts, who flies in with her husband (Ewan McGregor) and daughter (Abigail
Breslin), is anxious and depressed. Lewis, the flightiest daughter, arrives
with a stranger (Dermot Mulroney) she introduces, to her family’s surprise, as
her fiancé. Nicholson, the most reserved and quietly dutiful of the daughters,
has been helping her mother’s caretaker (Misty Upham), to what many characters
assume is the detriment of her personal life. Streep’s sister (Margo
Martindale), brother-in-law (Chris Cooper), and nephew (Benedict Cumberbatch)
arrive as well, casserole in tow.
The centerpiece of the film is a lengthy disastrous dinner scene
in which everyone gets to masticate over their lines with great delight as they
start slow and build to a great roaring cacophony of spitting, wailing,
teasing, lamenting, hollering, accusing, reminiscing, and snapping. In this
scene, and many that approach its intensity of character and feeling, the
acting is energetic, enthusiastic, and convincing in a beautifully theatrical
way. It wouldn’t work if the ensemble was not so nicely balanced, some (Streep,
Roberts, Martindale, Lewis) going so big, teeth tearing at every bit of scenery
that crosses their paths, that others (Cooper, Nicholson, Breslin) can lean back
and go low-key and small. There’s a sense of generosity, the actors pitching
their performances at just the right levels to blend wonderfully without a
sense that anyone is trying to out act their castmates. It’s gloriously hammy
in the best sense of theatricality and the film is wise to step back and let
them roar.
That’s precisely what the film is best at giving us: a
talented ensemble chewing its way through delicious writing. It’s not much in
the way of visually interesting, but that’s hardly an attempt on my part to pin
the movie’s faults on staginess. On the contrary, I found the film’s theatrical
roots to be better the more clearly and simply shown. This is only the second
film from director John Wells, a longtime TV writer, director, and showrunner
most famous for NBC’s E.R. and
currently of Showtime’s Shameless. He
shoots the film only functionally, with little personality. He stays out of the
way of the crackling chaos in the familial war of words as old resentments
erupt, spilling over into freshly growing fissure vents.
Even after slightly over two hours, there’s not much clarity
in the geography of our surroundings or the house’s architecture. And the few
attempts to open up past the proscenium – just a couple of car trips, really –
seem too desperate an attempt to make it play at some imagined ideal of
cinematic interpretation. Wells’s inexpressive direction dutifully captures the
performances and allows for appreciation of Letts’s writing, but more
imagination in the visual staging, and maybe even a better sense of claustrophobia
by heightening the theatrical roots, would’ve brought the whole endeavor up to
the same level as the material and the performances. He traffic-cops the cast
capably, coaxing a fine-tuned sense of energy and a great underlying tension in
the straining relationships. But in the end, I found myself appreciating the
performances and the writing more than being moved by the whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment