There’s a lot of random silliness all over Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues, a
long-awaited follow up to the original cult hit. That’s in keeping with 2004’s Anchorman, a film that accommodates a
somewhat sharp puncturing of sexual harassment, a scene in which an angry biker
punts a dog off of a bridge, and a psychedelic animated sequence that stands in
for a sex scene. This time around, writer-director Adam McKay and co-writer/star
Will Ferrell step back easily into the anything goes world of Ron Burgundy, the
mustachioed, egotistical, 1970’s chauvinist who strides through the films with
extreme confidence, like he’s trying out poses for his own taxidermied
afterlife. The first time, McKay and Ferrell created a gleefully giggly movie,
broad, thin, and full of unashamed shtick, wall-to-wall quotable non sequiturs.
They double down here, indulging in arbitrary asides, consequence-free
slapstick, splashes of mild surrealism, and loud noises. (I don’t know what
they’re yelling about!) The result is a jumbled grab bag of nonsense, creaking
dead air, and patches of inspired insanity.
The first film found Burgundy and his newsroom buddies –
Paul Rudd, Steve Carell, and David Koechner – howling in anguished sleaziness
over their station manager (Fred Willard) bringing on a woman (Christina
Applegate) co-anchor. It was a period piece goof about sexism in the workplace.
This time, McKay has his eye on skewering the 24-hour news channels, so he
traces the idea back to the late-70’s/early-80’s source, the time between the
suicide smash cut to black and the darkly funny little typeface reading simply
“80s” in Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie
Nights. Burgundy, having fallen on hard times, is approached by a producer
putting together programming for a new network. The once-proud newsman decides
to get the team back together and do what he was put on Earth to do: read the
news. The early moments of the movie contain a certain amount of affection and
interest for those of us who simply like seeing Ferrell, back in character
after all these years, drive around picking up Rudd, Carell, and Koechner. It’s
been nine years, but these guys do still good impressions of themselves.
Eventually, a plot emerges. Or rather, several plots emerge,
some more important than others, none going much of anywhere, all tossed overboard at a moment’s notice if
something more immediately funny (theoretically) comes along. Burgundy feels competition with a
handsome hotshot anchor (James Marsden), who swoops in with the primetime slot
locked down. Burgundy is also intimidated by his new boss – a black woman (Meagan
Good), facts that rarely goes unmentioned, even when the guys are on their best
behavior, which isn’t often. He’s unsure how to relate to his seven year old
son (Judah Nelson), asking the mother “Are you sure he’s not a mentally
challenged midget?” Still elsewhere, the channel’s owner (Josh Lawson) wants to meddle
in news coverage for synergistic reasons and a harried producer (Dylan Baker,
performing as if he told Ed Helms he’d fill in and no one would know the
difference) tries to keep Burgundy and crew from failing too spectacularly, as they try to introduce vapid gossip, bullying patriotism, and endless on-screen graphics
to TV news. Sound familiar?
It all plays like a brainstorming session ever so slowly
galumphing its way towards something like a story. There’s lots of fine
satirical intent going on here, sometimes sharp and pointed. After all, how
better to say the very idea of 24-hour news channels is inherently flawed than
to say these dummies invented it for self-serving career reasons. When Burgundy
decides to cover a car chase live, or spend some time repeatedly, simply
saying, “America is great,” McKay cuts to people all over the country staring
slack jawed in awe. “Hey, guys!” one man says. “The news got awesome!” This is
definitely the work of a director with a funny rage funneled into
sociopolitical points. It’s almost expected. He’s the guy who made big banks a villain
in his 2010 cop comedy The Other Guys
and then ran graphs about the financial crisis under the end credits. That’s
funny and sharp. But Anchorman 2 drifts
indulgently, though, watching characters stand around acting out
self-consciously funny moments. It’s as if the movie is throwing out lines and hoping
some stick as catchphrases on novelty merchandise.
I think the problem is the thrust of the film trying to make
us care about Ron Burgundy as a character. He was a sketch character, a buffoon
whose rise and fall and rise in Anchorman
was played broadly for laughs. During the course of Anchorman 2, Burgundy cycles through a half-dozen highs and lows,
competing interests, and vacillating levels of self-awareness. Instead of being
the butt of the joke – the first film’s thrust was puncturing his backwards
ways, having us root for Applegate – he’s front and center. It’s distracting and borderline unlikable to root for a character who stumbles around obliviously, at one point casually spitting out racist remarks at a sweet family dinner, and then telling his black boss he’s blameless since it’s her fault for inviting him in the first place. The movie wants him
to succeed on his own terms, even if the movie keeps forgetting about some of his motivations for long periods of time, rarely able to hold two ideas in its head at any given point.
At worst, it’s not funny. At best, the movie bubbles up into a kind of frenzied nonsense. But the bulk of its
truly nutzoid moments happen in the last twenty minutes or so. Anchorman’s 94 minute runtime has here
ballooned to 119 minutes, which for a while in the middle feels like three or
four hours. Subplots muscle each other out for screen time. Carell’s dumb
weather guy meets and falls in love with an equally dumb secretary (Kristen
Wiig) for what seems like forever, but is in actuality only a handful of
scenes. Throughout there are funny little one-or-two-scene performances from
unexpected faces that I won’t mention here. They’re good for an unexpected
smile the first time around. But then, things get pleasantly insane, erupting
in events so unexpected and cheerfully nonsensical that I couldn’t help but
devolve into laughter.
I won’t try to describe the final stretch of the film here.
But I will say it pivots into a long period that seems to be parodying a very
different kind of movie altogether and then culminates in a cavalcade of cameos
I found pleasantly surprising in its hilarious escalation up, up, and away from
what little reality the movie ever had. So a long, uneven comedy sends me out
with a smile anyway, after a seemingly endless stretch during which the big,
dumb, likable caricatures are put to use on a few distinct satirical points in
between indistinct nonsense. I can’t say I want to wave off the laughter
entirely, and yet I can’t recommend the picture wholeheartedly. Sometimes you
just have to describe your reactions and hope it gives the wink and nod to
those who are predisposed to liking this and warns off those who aren’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment