Admission is an agreeable
diversion. It’s a mellow college comedy set not amongst the students, but among
the employees. Specifically, as the title may have revealed for you, it’s set
in the admissions department. Our protagonist is Portia, who has been reading Princeton’s
college applications and their attendant essays for sixteen years now. Played
by Tina Fey, reason enough to like her immediately, she’s a hard-worker firmly
settled into her comfortable and predictable life. She’s in a long-term
relationship with a tenured English professor (Michael Sheen, in another one of
his uncannily convincing embodiments of insufferable academics), a man who
clearly takes her for granted. He’s dismissive and only vaguely affectionate
towards her. It’s one of those movie relationships that’s obviously doomed from
the get go. The story that follows involves Portia’s slow realization that the
life she’s living is not the one that will make her happy.
Enter Paul Rudd, playing the principal of an experimental
high school who invites her to visit their campus and give her usual spiel
about applying for Princeton. He’s taken a special interest in a gifted student
with a rocky transcript (Nat Wolff) and wants to make sure she notices and
gives this underdog a chance. It goes against all the rules, but in the movie’s
totally soft and unemphatic way, it forms a minor critique of the college
admissions process as one that is, in some cases, designed to weed out the more
unconventionally promising candidates. But that’s on the film’s thematic back burner,
since what it’s really interested in is showing us that the admissions Portia
most needs to make are to herself. It’s a low-key movie of self-discovery,
personal growth, and slow evolution of relationship statuses. Admirably serious
about its setting in academia, an unconventional setting and approach for
Hollywood films of any kind, it’s a film that’s nonetheless so low-key that I
was almost afraid that movie itself was going to fall asleep right before my
very eyes.
That it doesn’t is a testament to the charms of the cast
which, Fey and Rudd aside, features lovely small-scale character work from
national treasures like Lily Tomlin (as Fey’s proudly liberal mother) and
Wallace Shawn (as the head of the admissions department). Director Paul Weitz
(working in a mode much closer to his About
a Boy than his American Pie or,
God forbid, Little Fockers) and
screenwriter Karen Croner (adapting the novel by Jean Hanff Korelitz) keep
things moving along cleanly and clearly with a gentle tug of narrative to push
the emotions along in easy and relaxed ways. It’s sometimes funny, but in an
off-hand way rather than through any conventional zingers. It’s sometimes
romantic, but in such a wispy way that it almost registers after-the-fact. It’s
sometimes pointed in explicit summoning of sociopolitical concerns and cultural
studies, but only in the softest possible ways. I found myself smiling and
soothed, if not exactly captivated and entertained.
A tidy embrace of open-endedness and a polite salute to
mildly bad decisions snowballing into big life changes for the better, Admission ends up in a sweet, tender
place as an appealingly minor work. Never once does the movie insist upon its
own worth. Nor does it reach for anything more than its deliberate slightness.
It’s merely a pleasant time with pleasant characters played pleasantly. It’s
the kind of entertainment I’d imagine would play just as well, if not better,
when viewed on cable TV while curled up on the couch some lazy wintry weekend
when a combination of coziness and the common cold demand a
just-complicated-enough piece of comfort.
No comments:
Post a Comment