It can’t be easy to set out to make a film dancing around in
the iconography of one of the greatest films of all time. Sam Raimi’s Oz the Great and Powerful, a film that
may not be great and powerful, but is certainly good and entertaining, uses
memorable aspects The Wizard of Oz
both big and small in inventive and surprising ways without embarrassing itself
or seeming a diminishment of a beloved cultural masterpiece. That is some kind
of wonderment. The film itself, which is set decades before the 1939 classic
and follows a Kansas con man magician into Oz, is an earnest work of sturdy
craftsmanship and showmanship, sparkling with a zippy sense of fun. Though it
seems to wobble here and there, threatening to fall flat on its face, it
rallies for a rousing ending. Mitchell Kapner and David Lindsay-Abaire’s script
constantly walks up to convention only to back away in delightful flourishes.
James Franco plays the magician who will become the Wizard
of Oz. He’s not quite believable, which is in some ways the point. (Just don’t
imagine what Raimi’s regular character actor Bruce Campbell, who appears late
in the film in a cameo, could have done with the role.) He’s a huckster with
sparkling charisma hidden behind a desperate layer of slimy smarm. The
prologue, set in a classically square aspect ratio and filmed in jaw-droppingly
gorgeous black and white, finds his magic act at a county fair dying painfully
when a sweet girl in a wheelchair begs him to make her walk again. The crowd
turns on him (“He’s not a real magician!”)
and on Oz’s face is written both the pain of a performer facing a hostile crowd
and a man torn up by the fact that there’s nothing he can do to help someone in
need. He feels like an unhelpful man without a purpose, unable to scam more
than a few coins from people he considers country bumpkins.
His personality problems don’t go away, but take on larger
phantasmagorical stakes when circumstances conspire to send him over the
rainbow. When he’s sucked into a tornado, he’s terrified that he’s about to
die, a natural reaction I’d say. When he lands in Oz, the screen expanding,
filling with color and obvious digital fakery, he’s befuddled and amused, but
tries to hide behind an opaque confidence that slips a bit when the real magic
starts sparking around him. It’s an interesting role that calls for a leading
man to fall into the background, confused and adrift in a sea of colorful
spectacle, while, thrillingly, the women around him hold all the real power in
this land and, whatever emotions romantic or otherwise they feel towards him,
view him as a pawn in their game of thrones. He meets three witches (Mila
Kunis, Rachel Weisz, and Michelle Williams). At least one is a good witch.
One’s a bad witch who, by film’s end, becomes awfully wicked. The third will
probably have a house dropped on her head at some point in her future.
The man who would be Wizard is told he’s fulfilling a
prophecy by showing up in Oz. To claim the Emerald City’s throne – and all the
riches the position supplies – all he must do is kill a wicked witch. Seems
easy enough, so off he shuffles down the yellow brick road where, along the
way, an ingratiating flying monkey (Zach Braff) and a broken China Doll (Joey
King) join the quest. Raimi draws upon his directorial skill sets from both his
horror background (The Evil Dead, Drag Me to Hell) and his big budget
spectacles (Spider-man, Spider-man 2),
staging sequences like a tantalizingly creepy/funny walk through a gloomy
forest with ominous crows, snapping plants with glowing eyes, and a hooded
figure gliding out of the fog of a graveyard, modulating tension and relief in
supremely entertaining ways, cut together in a variety of pop art frames with
smartly varied pace. Later, he’ll stage a dazzling witch-on-witch battle that
follows a supreme visual and narrative pleasure in the reveal of the surprising
way the fraudulent Wizard claims him throne. It’s all of a piece with Raimi’s
skill with mixing humor and thrills, creating playful spectacle that’s always
aware of its own fiction without lessening the impact of its storytelling.
And what storytelling! It’s lumpy in spots and the character
arcs are obvious, but the film is wrapped up in an old-fashioned, hyper-earnest
sense of theatrical flourish. By the time the curtain (quite literally) falls,
there’s a sense of a master showman shouting “ta-da!” To the tunes of one of
Danny Elfman’s best scores in recent memory, the screen is filled with colorful
CGI landscapes and charming creature work that’s gloriously fake, approaching
the Technicolor perfection of The Wizard
of Oz’s painted backdrops. But that’s not to say the effects are wholly
unconvincing. On the contrary, they’re often quite spectacular when they need
to be. Franco’s travelling companions are effects that work incredibly well.
The monkey, for instance, sells some nonverbal punchlines through nothing more
than the shifting expressions on his face. The look of the film is appealing
through and through. The Land of Oz itself is a glittering jewel of
manufactured whimsy and the witches’ elegant wardrobes look like they were cut
from the same cloth as MGM’s 1930’s costume department. To top it all off, the
3D is as dazzling as any I’ve seen. (Put it on the short list with Avatar, Hugo, and Life of Pi as essential live action 3D.) Oz is a funny, surprising magic music box of sturdy childlike
wonder.
Note: Although I like
this film a bit less than the unfairly maligned and forgotten John Carter, it’s interesting to note that two years in
a row Disney has released in March an expensive live action film inspired by
turn-of-the-20th-century genre fiction about a man in the early 1900s who is
whisked away to a different world where he’s just the variable needed to tip
the balance in a struggle between competing factions.
No comments:
Post a Comment