Rather than being lousy and dull all the way through, Celeste and Jesse Forever has the
unfortunate disappointment-enhancer of seeming rather promising at the start. The
central joke of the film is a funny
one. Celeste (Rashida Jones) and Jesse (Andy Samberg) are best friends, cozily
intimate, and giggle their way through countless in-jokes. The problem? They’ve
been divorced for six months. That’s a good joke and a fine reverse-rom-com
riff, but if you wait around for director Lee Toland Krieger to expand upon
that promising nugget, you’ll be waiting a long time. This is a mopey
relationship movie about characters dealing with real problems in a film that
is content to use them in schematic and dispiriting ways.
Celeste is a successful publicist and author while Jesse is
an artistic layabout. She still cares about him, but would really like him out
of the house. When he meets a girl and does just that, she’s hurt. There’s real
emotion here, but it’s bleached away by all the predictable storytelling machinations
from which the film initially seemed to be turning away. There are plot
developments that, though I understood why the screenwriting handbook would
need them to happen, feel wrong, feel too disruptive to the gentle character work that Jones and Samberg are up to here.
Jones, so good on the essential sitcom Parks & Recreation, co-wrote the movie with Will McCormack (who
turns up in a small, likable role as a pot dealer/relationship guru), and
together they’ve written themselves some interesting roles. There’s also room
around the margins for delightful-in-theory roles for a solid ensemble that
includes Ari Graynor, Chris Messina, Emma Roberts, and Elijah Wood. They’re all
likable screen presences that aren’t given enough time or good material to make
much of an impact. This is a movie about the leads and Jones and Samberg are
perhaps too good at selling their chemistry, since the ultimate breakdown of
the relationship is only partially and haltingly convincing.
Most unfortunately, Jones and McCormack didn’t write a movie
that can capitalize on these characters and the promising setup. At first I was
straining to like the film, but as it meandered its way to an unsatisfying
conclusion, I just couldn’t keep my enthusiasm from wandering away. Krieger
shoots the film in a routine loose way that does the slack plotting no favors,
occasionally indulging in visual beauty – a shot of fireworks was rather
lovely, if pointless – that only serves to reveal just how empty the whole
thing ultimately is. The film coasts on the charms of its cast and the strength
of its concept far further than that will actually take it.
No comments:
Post a Comment