I caught it in a mall multiplex near the end of its
theatrical run. I’m glad I did. The film is not without it’s flaws. That’s
putting it mildly. But I found it to be a compelling and even moving
experience. Is it mechanical and manipulative in its use of a recent tragedy to
give weight to its otherwise flimsy story? Certainly. But it barreled past my
objections and worked on me. I can’t deny that it’s heavy handed, that it might
just be too slick for its own good, that it meanders and sometimes bobbles its
tone. But it’s also often powerfully acted and quietly absorbing in ways that
surprised me given all the noxious critical reactions that surrounded its
release.
The film is about a young boy (Thomas Horn) whose father
(Tom Hanks) had a meeting in the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. In
the opening scene he expresses disgust that his mother (Sandra Bullock) decided,
since no body was recovered, to bury an empty coffin. His father’s death seems
to resist closure. It is a wound that won’t heal, a scab at which he keeps picking
away, hiding a makeshift shrine to 9/11 in the uppermost corner of his bedroom
closet. For him, the idea of closure is at once intensely necessary and to be
resisted. There can be no closure. The most wounding moment of the film comes
in a scene that’s the least heavy-handed and the best acted in which the boy
finds just the right words to hurt his mother, to lash out at the only person
who can share his pain. In that scene, Horn is capably upset and Bullock's reaction is
devastating. It’s a moment of emotional impact that I wouldn’t want to shrug
off lightly.
Before 9/11, the father would create scavenger hunts to help
the shy, awkward, but intelligent child learn how to go out into the world and
find his way around obstacles. In his father’s death, the son finds the biggest
scavenger hunt of all. He wants to find meaning in the tragedy, to find a way
to make sense of his father’s death while honoring their relationship. He finds
a key in a small envelope in the closet where his mother left his father’s
belongings. Inside is a key. He thinks it will have all the answers. The
poignancy comes from knowing that there are no answers to come, knowing that even
if he does manage to find a lock that fits the key, he will eventually arrive
at disappointment.
The envelope has one word written on it: “Black.” So, the
boy looks up all of the people with the last name “Black” in the phone book and
sets out to find them all, sneaking around his mother to do so. The concept of
a little boy wandering by himself all over New York City is an oh-so-precious
one, gaining what seems to be only strained precociousness with the addition of
a neighbor, a mute, elderly Holocaust-survivor (Max Von Sydow) who takes it
upon himself to look after the kid on some of these expeditions. And yet, the
boy’s encounters with all manner of New Yorkers are just compelling enough to
survive the sentimentality. Each person who decides to stop and hear his story
contributes to this messy portrait of cross-cultural wounds in the wake of
tragedy. The most affecting of these vignettes belongs to Jeffrey Wright and
MVP Viola Davis, who once again proves that she can give depth and humanity to
any role in which she’s cast.
But the quest of the key is ultimately, for me, beside the
point. What really works here is the way the film circles around the tragedy,
returning to it as the boy’s traumatic memories of the day continue to swirl in
his head. Eventually, we get the full story of its impact on this family, of
the way they first heard the news, the way they reacted to it as they began to
realize they would never again see husband and father. Is it ultimately
shamelessly manipulative? Undoubtedly. There’s a cringe-worthy shot in which
Tom Hanks falls towards the camera, dropping out of the unseen World Trade
Center and hurtling through a clear blue sky in slow motion. Yikes.
But there’s also a scene when Bullock spies the burning
towers through a window at her workplace that’s an intensely sad and well
staged moment. And there’s also a scene in which a phone cuts out at the same
moment a TV in the background of the shot shows one of the towers collapsing.
The sonic and visual trauma of the moment is effective and potentially
overwhelming, much like the small catharsis that comes when Davis and Wright
reappear in the narrative towards the conclusion. It’s a film in which people
try to make their own sense out of tragic events, but that sense is inevitably
smaller and more personal than the shared trauma.
This is a film that’s constantly teetering on the edge of
disaster, not just the disaster of its subject, but a disaster of filmmaking as
well. I found it to have some moments of great acting, especially from Davis
and Bullock. I found it a film slightly more moving than cloying, slightly more
emotional than egregious and, so, my reaction to the film ultimately tips
slightly into the positive. Clearly, though, with material this volatile an
approach so sturdy and oblivious, and a central character so potentially
cloying, your mileage will most definitely vary. But reader, it held my
attention and, by the end, I was surprised to find myself emotionally involved
and moved. To report otherwise would be a disservice.
No comments:
Post a Comment