Were we ever really supposed to believe that in 1984, even
in the small Southern town setting of Herbert Ross’s Footloose, a law could be passed banning dancing? I don’t think so,
which is just as well, since the idea grows even more unbelievable in 2011 as
we see a modern version of the same story. No, this law is metaphor, pure and
simple, for generation gaps, for the way parents try to hold on to their teens
even as they pull away. That’s why this story worked in 1984 and why it still
works now. The first time around
it was an agreeable, casually iconic piece of 80’s kitsch. This time, the
material has been transmuted into a terrific piece of crowd-pleasing pop art.
The biggest reason for the improvement between the two
versions is the director Craig Brewer. With his two breakout, decidedly
R-rated, features Hustle and Flow and
Black Snake Moan, he explored Southern
life through the overlapping prisms of morality and music. Those films, gritty,
dripping with an atmosphere of humidity, sex, and danger, portrayed the South
in a fundamentally honest, if occasionally heightened way, treating the small
town folks and their culture with clarity and honesty entirely devoid of
condescension. These are films that get under the skin, that are so sharply
written and performed that the reality of the stories are never in doubt.
He brings this skill to bear on the fundamentally silly
bubblegum material of Footloose with
the same lack of condescension and the same eye for detail. He doesn’t just
remake Footloose; he makes Craig
Brewer’s Footloose. This is a
terrifically textured film, right from the opening scene in which a bunch of
kids bop around to the same Kenny Loggins’s song that opens the original. Here,
in what is clearly a secret, edgy, teen party of some kind, the kids’ feet are
tapping and stomping on a sticky makeshift floor that wobbles a bit with each
bounce, rattling the crumpled and half-empty red plastic cups that littler the
ground. I could smell the drying drinks and feel the heat of the tightly packed
dancers. But the fun they’re having won’t last long.
Speeding away from the party, laughing and singing, a group
of teens cross the center line and slam into an oncoming truck. It’s a moment
that plays out in quick visceral specificity of crunching metal and flares of
fire. This was always the inciting incident for the town’s ban on dancing, but
here, shown so specifically, it feels rawer and more convincing. A voice over
that leads into a cut to a town meeting features the town preacher (played
wonderfully by Dennis Quaid), whose son was among the dead, delivering a
tearful speech advocating for the law. As he speaks in front of the
townspeople, it’s as if he’s speaking directly to his wife (Andie MacDowell),
promising to keep kids safe. It is a surprisingly moving and effective moment.
The plot dictates that he is the authority figure that will be in opposition to
the protagonist, but he’s also just a man who thinks that he’s doing what’s
right.
This plot is familiar, but at every turn it feels pleasantly
fresh, suddenly strangely relevant in ways it never has been. Brewer sets the
film specifically in the now, referencing the financial difficulties of living
in this recession, situating itself as being about the ways each new generation
inevitably takes control of its own identity. This is not just a story of
repression or reactionary ideologies and Brewer takes care to keep blame away
from the small town itself. This is a story of young people learning when to
accept and when to challenge the ways of the establishment. That may be
communicated with a bit of a silly metaphor, but that doesn’t take away from
the underlying truths expressed.
The remainder of the film unfolds as anyone who has seen the
original (or the Broadway musical it inspired) will remember, with a few good
changes (bus racing instead of tractor chicken) and musical callbacks. Big city
boy Ren MacCormack (dancer Kenny Wormald, quite good in what is essentially his
acting debut) shows up in town to live with his Uncle (Ray McKinnon) and his
family. He finds small town life difficult to adjust to and is further stymied
by his reputation as a hoodlum, a reputation seemingly earned just because he’s
new, likes to play his music loud, and show off his dance moves and sarcastic
attitude. This draws him close to the wild, rebelling preacher’s daughter
(Julianne Hough), with whom he starts a tentative flirtation despite her
thuggish boyfriend (Patrick John Flueger). But the sense of small town
restrictions constricts Ren’s sense of agency. When his new pals (Miles Teller
and Ser’Darius Blain) tell him dancing’s illegal, why that’s just the last
straw. Something has to change. These kids need to dance!
The approach to the dancing in the film is fun. The illegal
dancing in the film is furtive, and choppy, shot in ways that feels urgent,
covered with sweat, even sexual. The big city escape, which ends up employing
infectious line dancing (that’s the first time I’ve used those words in that
order), plays out in lovely long shots that allow us to see the whole bodies of
the dancers as they execute their movements. Later, a scene involving a group
of little girls teaching some dance moves is awfully cute and a fun callback to
the original. Finally, the dancing that ends the film is shot with a triumphal
sense of natural energy. The world of the small town in the film feels so still
and clamped down, that the sequences of music and dance burst out of the
texture with a quick, volatile sense of release.
As with the dancing, Brewer’s textures keep this film lively
and engaging, instead of settling down into rote remake mode. Along with
stellar cinematography by Amy Vincent, this is a film that feels lit up with an
inner glow and situated with great care in an environment that feels real and
convincing. This is a sweaty, oily, film where the textures of every piece of the
cars, the fields, and the characters’ skin are vividly apparent. When the teens
cut loose, I could feel the energy, the heat, the effort, the exhaustion, and
their fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment