Crazy, Stupid, Love is
a romantic comedy that tries to do something new but in the process finds only
stale ways to do the same old things. It’s a film with a deeply talented
ensemble that walks through intertwining rom-com plotlines, but at the core the
whole thing is flat and unconvincing. It has one foot in low-key observational
humor and another in broad sentimental jokiness with no idea how to reconcile
the two. As a result, the film lurches from moment to moment and, though
individual scenes and performances can be quite good, the whole thing is
nothing more than a disappointment.
The film stars Steve Carell and Julianne Moore as a married
couple of twenty-five years. We are quickly made aware of their deteriorating
relationship in an opening scene that makes economical use of editing and
framing. We see a bustling restaurant from the point of view of several pairs
of feet in fancy shoes, one after the other paired off playing footsie. Then,
we cut to two pairs of feet that are stationary and separated with shoes of
decidedly lower quality and flashiness. These feet belong to Carell and Moore
as they sit with their dessert menus trying to decide what they want. “Why
don’t we say what we want at the same time?” Carell suggests. So they do. He
says “crème brûlée.” She says “a
divorce.”
From there on out we follow Carell as he tries to get back
into the dating game with the help of a ladies’ man (Ryan Gosling) he runs into
at a local bar. Meanwhile, his soon-to-be-ex wife makes tentative steps towards
an office romance with her company’s accountant (Kevin Bacon). Sprinkled
throughout the main thrust of the plot, their thirteen-year-old son (Jonah
Bobo) wrestles with his crush on the teenage girl (Analeigh Tipton) who
babysits his little sister (Joey King) while the ladies’ man may have finally
found the one perfect girl (Emma Stone) who will make him decide to settle
down.
Writer Dan Fogelman, who has also written Tangled and Cars (how’s that for variety?), weaves the various plot threads
together as clumsily as he handles the tone. The characters are sometimes well
drawn and other times seem to be barely more than a one-note joke. Take Marisa
Tomei, who shows up in a handful of scenes in barely more than a cameo, for an example
that’s indicative of the strange approach the film takes. Her character, a
woman who is picked up at the bar by Carell, is made the butt of relentless
sexist jokes. She’s ridiculed for being aggressive in her pursuit of a
relationship, then ridiculed for later expressing surprise that Carell doesn’t
call her back. When she reappears in a crowd of people during the climax, all
she can do is sit on the sidelines and shoot daggers with her gaze as she flips
him the bird. What a waffling, cruel way to treat a character, not only by the
film but also by the characters within it.
Similar problems exist with the Gosling character. Now,
Gosling is super charming and his rakish role works just fine, but by the time
the film makes an attempt at deepening the character, it feels forced. It’s fun
to see his wandering ways tamed by Emma Stone, who flips the power balance in
the relationship, but it doesn’t feel like it should move as fast as it does.
Far more honest and patient is the way Bobo’s puppy love is handled, at least
until it becomes precocious mawkish speechifying in the final twenty minutes
before returning to subtlety in the end, giving him the final shot of the film.
In fact, his is the most compelling of the plot lines. Maybe this should have
been his coming-of-age story instead of an I-still-love-my-ex divorcee’s
fantasy. Carell and Moore do all the heavy lifting with characterization that
the screenplay doesn't quite give them. They communicate more in body language than
they do through speaking.
Directors Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, who directed last
year’s I Love You, Phillip Morris, a
terrific raunchy based-on-a-true-story farce, do their best impression of a
mid-80’s James L. Brooks or perhaps a mid-90’s Cameron Crowe, but the script
just isn’t up to their level of craftsmanship. There are scenes here that
shine. I especially loved a late backyard confrontation that features every
character’s secret revealed in a believably funny and tense way. Perhaps what
the film lacks most is an intensity and immediacy that comes forth in that
moment and in others like that opening scene, or some of the material between
Bobo and Tipton, or the first real date between Gosling and Stone. There’s
great stuff here, but not, unfortunately, a great movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment